Wednesday, May 13, 2026

Mid-Week Post

Your middle-of-the-week info binge ...

 

Canada is merely a carcass over which certain interested parties argue:

In the autumn of 2016, Canada 2020 found itself at the center of a political firestorm. The progressive think tank, founded a decade earlier by four Liberal insiders, stood accused of something that sounded almost medieval in its brazenness: cash-for-access. Corporate donors—TD Bank, Suncor, Enbridge, Manulife—were paying tens of thousands of dollars for events featuring Prime Minister Justin Trudeau and his cabinet ministers. No public disclosure. No transparency. Just money changing hands for time with power.

The organization responded with what corporate lawyers call a "disclaimer"—a donor agreement stating contributions were "not intended as a means to gain access." Problem solved, in theory. Except the disclaimer didn't change the fundamental structure: corporations still funded the events, ministers still attended, and the public still had no idea who was paying for what.

That was 2016. Today, the story has taken an extraordinary turn that would strain credulity in a political thriller. Mark Carney—the organization's advisory board chair—is now Prime Minister of Canada. Tom Pitfield, the president, is not only Trudeau's childhood friend but also runs the Liberal Party's digital infrastructure through a company paid by 97% of Liberal MPs using taxpayer-funded office budgets. His wife, Anna Gainey, is a Liberal MP and former Liberal Party President. And still—nearly a decade after the scandal—there is zero public disclosure of who funds Canada 2020 or how much they pay.

Just three days ago, on May 8, 2026, Canada 2020 hosted its 20th Anniversary Gala at Toronto's Fairmont Royal York with former U.S. President Barack Obama as the keynote speaker. Prime Minister Carney attended. The event was closed to media. Who paid to bring Obama to Toronto? How much did corporate sponsors contribute to attend "An Evening with President Barack Obama"? What policy discussions occurred between a sitting Canadian Prime Minister, a former U.S. President, and undisclosed corporate donors? The answers remain hidden behind Canada 2020's wall of opacity. …

To understand Canada 2020, you must first understand the network of relationships that gave birth to it and continues to animate it today. This is not a story about abstract institutional influence—it's about specific people whose personal friendships, family connections, and business interests converge at the apex of Canadian political power.

Start with Tom Pitfield. His father, Michael Pitfield, served as Clerk of the Privy Council under Pierre Trudeau—the most senior non-elected position in the Canadian government. Tom grew up as a childhood friend of Justin Trudeau. When Trudeau entered politics, Pitfield became his digital strategist, running the Liberal Party's data operations in the 2015 and 2019 elections. He did this through his company, Data Sciences Inc., which maintains an exclusive agreement to manage the party's voter database, known as "Liberalist."

Then came the contracts. In 2021, investigative reporting by The Globe and Mail revealed that 149 Liberal MPs—97% of the caucus—were paying Data Sciences Inc. from their taxpayer-funded office budgets. The collective payments exceeded $30,000. When questions were raised, the federal Ethics Commissioner investigated and cleared Trudeau, finding he was "not involved" in the contracting decisions. The payments continued.


Read the whole thing.

 

 

Speaking of tyrants:

Security experts, human rights advocates and politicians are sounding the alarm about the renewal of a co-operation agreement between the Royal Canadian Mounted Police and China’s Ministry of Public Security as troubling details surface at a foreign interference trial.

Court documents filed at the trial of alleged double agent William Majcher reveals that at least 25 Canadian residents were targeted by Chinese police under an anti-corruption program, which doubled as a tool of transnational repression. The affidavit shows that the Chinese nationals may have been forced to return to their homeland against their will to face punishment for alleged financial crimes.

Some of them would have faced life imprisonment, or even a death sentence.

The 63-year-old Majcher, a former RCMP officer, is accused of illegally participating in an international anti-corruption campaign launched by Chinese President Xi Jinping called “Operation Fox Hunt,” which was later followed by a similar campaign known as “Operation SkyNet.” The judge’s verdict is expected on Wednesday. …

China says Fox Hunt and SkyNet seek to repatriate economic fugitives, but human rights organizations say, in reality, the campaigns target Chinese nationals living abroad who are political rivals, dissidents and critics of Beijing.

Research from the Spain-based NGO Safeguard Defenders found that China’s Ministry of Public Security, or the MPS, operated at least 102 illegal police stations in 53 countries around the world, including Canada.

In January before Majcher’s trial began, Prime Minister Mark Carney signed a new strategic partnership with Xi to jumpstart trade and usher in Chinese EV’s in exchange for lowering punishing tariffs on Canadian canola.

The agreement signed in Beijing also included a memorandum of understanding (MOU) titled “Cooperation in Combating Crimes between the RCMP and the MPS.” In the joint statement, the two sides “committed to strengthening law enforcement co-operation to combat corruption and transnational crimes, including telecommunication and cyber fraud and illegal synthetic drugs in accordance with their respective laws.”

On Tuesday afternoon, Vancouver NDP MP Jenny Kwan wrote an open letter to express serious concerns about the government’s lack of transparency in signing the MOU.

 Kwan wrote that it is “troubling” that the federal government has “declined to proactively disclose the police co-operation agreement, despite its significant implications for public safety, civil liberties, diaspora communities and national sovereignty.”

In a social media post, she noted that other agreements the prime minister signed while in Beijing were released publicly, such as an economic and trade co-operation roadmap.

The RCMP says the agreement signed in January is a renewal of an MOU previously signed by former prime minister Justin Trudeau in 2016.

 

 

Fat schlubs to the rescue!:

The Defence department will need more money to hire additional public servants and military personnel to handle the influx of 300,000 Canadians into a new mobilization force, according to federal government documents.

The mobilization plan now being developed is an initiative being pushed by Chief of the Defence Staff Gen. Jennie Carignan.

The initiative, outlined in a May 2025 document, calls for the creation of a 300,000-strong supplementary reserve force and a boost to the primary reserves from the current 23,561 to 100,000.

The mobilization plan was first reported by the Ottawa Citizen in October 2025. The new pool of 300,000 volunteers would be used in the event of a national crisis or emergency.

 

These are civil servants and diverse masses who don’t know which end of the rifle is which.

What can go right?

 

 

Presented without comment:

 

 

Oh, I think I know why:

A Statistics Canada survey on quality of life in Canada has revealed which provinces have the highest life satisfaction — and which ranks the lowest.

Overall, the data showed that 46.1 per cent of Canadians reported a high level of life satisfaction in the second quarter of 2025, up from 40.4 per cent in the same period in 2024. However, that figure slipped from the first quarter of 2025, when 48.6 per cent of Canadians reported high life satisfaction.

The quarterly survey, which polls Canadians over the age of 15, asked respondents: “Using a scale of 0 to 10, where 0 means ‘Very dissatisfied’ and 10 means ‘Very satisfied’, how do you feel about your life as a whole right now?”

Those who responded with 8, 9 or 10 were considered to have high life satisfaction.

The data also broke down life satisfaction by province. At the top of the table, 57.3 per cent of Quebec residents reported high life satisfaction. This was followed by New Brunswick at 53.4 per cent, Newfoundland and Labrador at 51.3 per cent, and Nova Scotia at 49.1 per cent.

At the other end of the ranking is Alberta, where just 38.1 per cent of respondents rated their life satisfaction highly. Ontario came in at 42 per cent, Saskatchewan at 43.8 per cent, British Columbia at 44.8 per cent, and Manitoba at 45.6 per cent.

StatCan did not examine the reasons behind the provincial differences, but the findings arrived amid growing signs of frustration in Alberta.

 



 

Too bad.

You voted for green, you voted for poverty:

A majority of B.C. residents are on board with the federal plan to move ahead with Enbridge’s Westcoast LNG pipeline expansion, according to new data from the Angus Reid Institute. This support is evidence of the changing landscape of support for pipelines in Canada’s most western province, says ARI.

There is majority support for the Westcoast LNG pipeline expansion across the country (55 per cent) and in B.C. (61 per cent). Support outnumbers opposition by three to one, according to ARI’s data.

The federal government approved a $4-billion expansion of the southern portion of Enbridge’s Westcoast natural gas pipeline system in April. The pipeline carries natural gas from northeastern B.C. to consumers and businesses in the province’s Lower Mainland.

“There is also a desire for more,” says a May 11 statement released by Angus Reid with the new data. “Half (48 per cent) in Canada, and more than two-in-five (46 per cent) in B.C., believe the federal government is ‘doing too little to build new pipeline capacity.’”

Nationally, three in ten (31 per cent) say the federal government’s approach is about right, while one in five (21 per cent) say there is too much of a focus on building pipelines.

The number of respondents who are in opposition has shrunk by six points compared to 2019, says Angus Reid, when the Trans Mountain expansion was under debate.

 

 

I’m shocked, but not at all:

A quarter of Ontario’s private trucking schools offering mandatory entry-level training for commercial drivers have never been inspected by the provincial government, Auditor General Shelley Spence said Tuesday, raising concerns about oversight and road safety in the sector.

Spence released a special audit on Ontario’s large commercial truck driver licensing system, finding that 54 of the province’s 216 registered private career colleges offering mandatory entry-level training had “never been inspected.” She also found that of the 81 schools due for a five-year reinspection, 44 had not been reinspected.

“That is true, 25% had never been inspected,” Spence told reporters during a news conference at Queen’s Park. “And then for those that are supposed to be re inspected in a five year period, we found that 44% of those had not been re inspected.”

Asked whether some schools had operated without any government employee ever setting foot inside, Spence replied: “Right, correct.”

The audit examined Ontario’s oversight of commercial truck driver training, testing and licensing. Large commercial trucks account for 12% of vehicles involved in fatal collisions in Ontario despite making up only 3% of vehicles on the road, according to the report.

The auditor general found inconsistencies in both training and testing standards. Ontario requires Class A commercial drivers to complete 103.5 hours of mandatory entry-level training, but auditors found some schools delivered significantly less instruction.

“Based on our students experiences at training providers, we found examples where schools delivered only 59.5 and 81 hours,” Spence said in her prepared remarks.

The report also found some students were not taught key driving skills, including “left turns at major intersections, reverse parking and emergency stopping.”

Spence said auditors used six students to test training providers and found gaps in two cases.

“Two out of six is pretty big ratio, I would say,” she told reporters. “So, you know, that’s a sample, and we sample, I can’t really extrapolate to the whole population, but I will say that it is a problem.”

The audit also found that some unregistered private career colleges continued booking road tests despite having previously been investigated and penalized.

“What we found is that they had been given suspensions the private career college, and yet those students were still registering under another college’s name to take the tests,” Spence said.

Auditors also identified inconsistencies between DriveTest centres. Some locations used lower-speed highways for testing highway driving manoeuvres, while others did not randomly test reversing skills as required.

Spence said the province needs stronger oversight and inspections to improve road safety.

“Road safety depends not only on the rules, but on consistent training, testing and enforcement,” she said in her prepared remarks.

 

 

Consider that there are people willing to deny this:

Among the mutilated and butchered bodies of young women slaughtered on October 7, it was their colourful, polished nails that many of the morgue staff remember.

Bright, beautiful, shiny, pink manicures glistening amid the pervasive 'grey and green' of death were often the only reminder of who these girls had been just hours earlier.

Because Hamas-led terrorists had not just executed these women. They had 'deliberately and systematically' defiled them, as the most comprehensive account of the atrocity released by The Civil Commission today shows.

The terrorists shot their eyes, their faces and their breasts, and even targeted their most intimate parts, to destroy their beauty and rob their loved ones of a final goodbye.

Women were stripped, bound, stabbed, shot and burned. They were executed both during and after rape amid an orgy of violence in which 1,200 people were killed and 250 taken hostage.

Heads were decapitated. Pelvic bones shattered. Even after death, sexual assault continued.

A grotesque, medieval obsession with sexual organs pervaded the crime scenes at the Nova Festival and in the Kibbutzim near Gaza.

At Kibbutz Be'eri, nails, sharp objects, and pieces of metal and plastic were similarly embedded in a woman whose body was discovered naked and bound. On another victim, grenades were used.

While ordinarily newspapers censor the full horrors of such accounts, today, as hard as it is, over 430 witnesses, survivors, experts and medical staff ask that you do not look away.

For over two years they have given evidence to The Civil Commission, an independent Israeli women's rights NGO established in the wake of October 7, 2023, in response to the failure of international institutions to address the sexual violence committed that day.




Tuesday, May 12, 2026

Winnipeg Schools to Ban Mother's Day and Father's Day

The Khmer Rouge didn't believe in families, either:

An elementary school in Winnipeg will send students home with “family gifts” this week, instead of traditional Mother’s Day and Father’s Day presents, part of a new trend among some Canadian schools downplaying or eliminating the traditional parental celebrations.

Grade 1 and 2 teachers at Sage Creek School in Winnipeg informed parents of the change last week, just days before Mother’s Day.

Winnipeg Free Press reports that teachers wrote a memo to parents explaining that the change is intended to “respect the diversity of families that are represented in our classroom and community.”

(Sidebar: like who?)


Bull. Sh--.

One is trying to blot out the family piece by piece. Destroy the family, destroy the individual.

Of course, Canadians will raise no objection, so blinded by "diversity" that they cannot see the pernicious absurdity of what is being done.


We Don't Have to Trade With China

Even the Democrats don't get what Carney is doing:


Over the weekend, Elissa Slotkin attended the Global Progress Action Summit in Toronto, where she described her efforts to warn Canadian leaders to be wary of cozying up to Beijing even amidst the current trade war with the U.S.

“I understand that Canada is looking elsewhere and trying to diversify,” Slotkin, a former CIA analyst now serving as the junior senator for Michigan, said in an interview with CBC.

She added, “the point that I would make, and did make to Canadian leaders, is just because (the United States) has become more difficult doesn’t mean the Chinese are always the straightest shooters when it comes to national security.”

It’s a warning that U.S. Democrats have previously raised in front of Canadian counterparts, even before the current trade war launched by the Trump White House.

**

The Mounties will not assure MPs a confidential partnership agreement with Chinese police signed by the Prime Minister excludes “transfer of personal information of Canadians or permanent residents,” records show. Pro-democracy activists cite Chinese police for atrocities including torture: “Police routinely arrest, detain and harass leaders and members of various ‘illegal’ religious groups.”


Your Incompetent, Slothful, Wasteful, Corrupt Government and You

It's like there is a contest to see who can be worse:

Staff in Prime Minister Mark Carney’s Privy Council Office attended a closed-door March 10 meeting to discuss which reporters would be blacklisted or “accredited,” Access To Information records show. Carney weeks later commemorated World Press Freedom Day by announcing: “A strong, independent and free press both defines and defends our values.”

**

Finance Minister François-Philippe Champagne yesterday disclosed another Canada Post bailout, the third in 16 months to a total $2.72 billion. Terms of the latest line of credit were concealed though previous financing was interest-free without any repayment deadline: ‘Revenues will not be sufficient pay all its operating and income charges.’

**

Federal managers have created yet more loopholes to avoid complying with cabinet’s “Buy Canadian” policy, Access To Information records show. The Department of Agriculture in an internal memo said it would only comply if it did not cost extra time or money and was “in the public interest.”





Wait Times in Ontario Emergency Rooms Have Risen In the Past Five Years

Another sign of Canada's decline:

Wait times for people seeking care at emergency departments across Ontario have dramatically increased over the past five years amid a “deepening Ontario hospital funding crisis,” according to a new report.

The study, published Monday by the left-leaning think tank Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives, found that 90 per cent of patients waited 4.5 hours for an initial assessment by a physician at a hospital emergency room in Ontario in 2024/2025, up from 2.7 hours in 2020-21. This, the report states, represents an alarming 67 per cent increase over a five-year period.

“Emergency department wait times are a canary in the coal mine for health system performance,” Andrew Longhurst, the author of the study, said at a news conference on Monday morning.

“Emergency departments with long wait times and overcrowding signal that the overall health system is struggling to meet patient demand.”

Wait times for hospital admission from the emergency department also saw a significant increase, the report states.

In 2020-21, 90 per cent of patients in the emergency department who were waiting to be admitted into hospital waited an average of 29 hours. That jumped to 44 hours in 2024-25, an increase of 52 per cent, the report states.

These indicators, Longhurst said, demonstrate a system that is “under immense strain.”

He noted that 55 per cent of hospitals in the province carried a deficit in 2024-25 and new data indicates that this number will increase to 70 per cent by the end of the 2025-26 fiscal year.

Longhurst said small hospitals are overrepresented in the group of hospitals running deficits. About 61 per cent of hospitals with operating revenues under $100 million ran a deficit last year despite representing only 49 per cent of all Ontario hospitals.

By contrast, of the hospitals with operating revenues above $100 million, only 49 per cent ran a deficit but represent 51 per cent of all Ontario hospitals.

“Smaller and rural hospitals are among the hardest hit by provincial funding austerity,” Longhurst said.

“Smaller hospitals generally have fewer resources to draw upon than large urban hospital systems… The report raises concerns about the ongoing financial sustainability of smaller hospitals if provincial funding fails to cover increasing operating costs.”

By region, northern and western parts of the province were more likely to see hospitals with deficits.

In the Local Health Integration Networks (LHIN) regions of Erie St. Clair and Mississauga Halton, all hospitals were in deficit last year.

“Provincial funding austerity is shrinking the public hospital capacity required to ensure patients receive timely access to care,” Longhurst said.

He added that the Financial Accountability Office of Ontario (FAO) has previously estimated that $6.4 billion in new health care spending is in needed in 2026-27 “just to maintain 2024-25 service levels.”

Despite this, the province has only earmarked $3.4 billion in additional spending, leaving a $3 billion shortfall in that fiscal year.

“Costs in the hospital sector have been increasing by about six per cent each year due to population health, aging, and inflation, according to the Ontario Hospital Association,” Longhurst said.

 

Population?

Like migrant population?

Granted the healthcare scheme has been collapsing for a long time, but surely one can't ignore the prized class of non-tax paying beneficiaries of Canadian taxpayer generosity?



How About ... No?

He who pays taxes goes wherever the hell he wants:

BC Parks plans to close Joffre Lakes Park to the public for a week this summer and for 23 days this fall to allow local First Nations the opportunity to “connect with the land.”

Similar closures have been carried out over the past few years, cutting off public access to the hiking trails and lake areas at the southwestern B.C. park 35 kilometres east of Pemberton. 

The park, known for its icefields and turquoise-blue lakes, will shut its gates to the general public from June 20 to 27 and from Sept. 8 to 30 to recognize “the importance” of the area to the Líl̓wat Nation and N’Quatqua, BC Parks said in a notice on its website.

“These periods will provide space for the Líl̓wat Nation and N’Quatqua to connect with the land,” the provincial agency said. “Day-use passes are not available during these periods.”





It's Spelled S-L-U-S-H F-U-N-D

The new boss is the same as the old boss:

Prime Minister Mark Carney’s government has committed $180 million in taxpayer money to a World Bank climate initiative aimed at accelerating the global transition away from fossil fuels to clean energy and addressing “gender equality gaps” in Small Island Developing States (SIDS).

According to the federal government’s grants and contributions website, the funding was provided to the World Bank through the “World Bank Clean Energy and SIDS Resilience Facility (CESR).”

The agreement — which was dated March 13, 2026, and ended on March 31 — lists a contribution value of $180,000,000 and identifies the recipient as “IBRD Trust Funds — World Bank.”

The contribution falls under Global Affairs Canada’s International Development Assistance program, which has the stated purpose of “reducing poverty for those living in countries where [the organization] engages in international development.”

One of the grant’s primary objectives is to “accelerate the shift away from fossil fuels” through financing renewable energy infrastructure, energy efficiency projects, and grid modernization in middle-income and low-income countries.

The program also aims at supporting “efforts to address gender equality gaps in the energy and blue economy sectors.”

Global Affairs states the CESR facility will support projects under four primary areas: technical assistance and regulatory reforms, energy transition initiatives, increased renewable energy development in SIDS, and “climate resilience” projects based in coastal and marine ecosystems.

Examples of SIDS include countries in the Caribbean, Pacific, Atlantic, Indian Ocean, such as Barbados, Jamaica, Fiji, Maldives, and Samoa, among others. 

The expected outcomes from the project include increased renewable energy deployment in countries with high levels of coal-generated electricity, reduced fossil fuel dependency, improved “gender equality” in renewable energy sectors, and expanded “gender-responsive management” of ecosystems and climate adaptation programs.

The federal website does not provide any in-depth details about which countries ultimately received funding or how projects were selected.

Oh, I think I know.


And Now For Something Completely Different

 



A quartet of Canadian anthropologists published two papers this week that provide remarkable new detective insights into the fate of the1845 Franklin Expedition, which saw 134 men set out in search of the fabled Northwest Passage only to vanish in the High Arctic. Both papers are products of the 21st-century genetics revolution — the equivalent of solving cold cases by matching DNA recovered from old human remains with samples from living descendants.

In one of the new reports, human bones from Erebus Bay on King William Island, at a site within walking distance of the twin wrecks of the expedition’s icebound ships, have been positively identified as belonging to three crewmen from the doomed HMS Erebus. One of the matching bones is a humerus attributed to an officers’ steward named John Bridgens, whose half-sister turns out to have been an ancestor of a well-known BBC news presenter. Another DNA-matching effort has put a name, David Young, to a skull and mandible that were already used almost a decade ago to produce a (perhaps somewhat fanciful) facial reconstruction. Young had joined the expedition at age 17 with the rank of “Boy, 1st class.”

The same anthropological team, in a second paper, has decisively solved one of the enduring mysteries of Franklin scholarship. In 1859, the skeleton of a dead sailor, unburied, was found alone on the south shore of King William Island. The body was dressed in a torn steward’s uniform, but was found to be carrying personal papers belonging to Harry Peglar, the Captain of the Foretop aboard Erebus’s sister ship Terror. The skeleton was originally left behind under a heap of rocks, but was relocated in 1973 and retrieved for the collection of Canada’s National Museum of Man, which misplaced it (along with all associated records) sometime in the 1980s. This left a total enigma: had the doubly lost dead man been Peglar, or somebody else?

With further forensic discoveries keeping the expedition in the spotlight, researchers returned to the gravesite of the mysterious sailor between 2019 and 2023 and were able to retrieve a few tiny bones left behind in 1973 — a metatarsal, along with two phalanges from the late sailor’s right hand. The DNA from these fragments were matched with descendants of several candidates, and they have turned out to belong to Harry Peglar after all.

Which advances the mystery only one step further. Why did Peglar, who left England bearing the rank of a senior petty officer and serious shipboard responsibilities to go with it, die in the uniform of a servant? His remains were found with a clothes brush, indicating that he must have actually performed the duties of a steward, and he was wearing a neckerchief tied loosely, in the way a steward’s would be.

There was no shortage of clothing even in the most desperate moments of the expedition — the doomed men left mountains of it behind — so the anthropologists suggest that Peglar must have gotten in trouble and been disrated after Terror left England. His previous service record survives, the authors note, and it does show a pattern of intermittent offences against naval discipline; at one point, Peglar was sentenced to two dozen lashes for “drunkenness and mutinous conduct.”

Perhaps it was inevitable that this bad egg, who had served on Royal Navy anti-slavery and anti-piracy missions and survived the First Opium War, is the closest thing that the ill-fated expedition had, in the end, to a voice. The half-legible “Peglar Papers” he was carrying on his person contain apparent references to Captain Franklin’s 1847 funeral and to the cruel sledge journey that the survivors of the shipwrecks eventually made toward the Canadian mainland. (They also provide an obscene parody, in Peglar’s handwriting, of a famous sea poem of the time.)



Avi Lewis Said What?

What is his angle?:

The Conservatives and NDP sit on opposite sides of the spectrum, but they’re voicing similar concerns about the trajectory of Canada’s medical assistance in dying (MAID) regime.

The two opposition parties could be moving toward an unlikely alliance against further expansion, with a report on extending MAID eligibility to the mentally ill expected by summer.

Conservative MP Michael Cooper, a member of the joint House-Senate committee putting together the report, reiterated his party’s opposition to the expansion of MAID for the mentally ill last week.

“I think the evidence is very clear that the expansion for MAID and mental illness cannot go forward,” Cooper told reporters on Wednesday.

Cooper said that there were “two fundamental issues” making the expansion untenable: the challenge in diagnosing which mental illnesses are irremediable and the difficulty in determining whether those requesting MAID are of sound mind.

The Liberal government, which first introduced MAID for terminal illnesses in 2016, has twice delayed its expansion to individuals whose sole underlying condition is a mental disorder. The expansion was initially set to take effect in March 2023, after the government accepted a Senate proposal for a sunset period on the exclusion of MAID from the mentally ill.

This was subsequently pushed back to March 2024 and, most recently, March 17, 2027.

Cooper said the Liberals’ appropriate course of action would be to introduce a bill delaying the expansion indefinitely.

He and his fellow Conservatives may have an unlikely ally in upstart federal NDP leader Avi Lewis.

Dr. John Maher, who specializes in treating severe mental illness, spoke at a special joint parliamentary committee weighing Canada's plan to extend MAID for mental disorders.

Speaking to reporters in Ottawa one week earlier, Lewis said he was concerned by recent reports of mentally vulnerable Canadians choosing MAID “out of desperation.”

“People in mental health crisis should be getting the supports that they need,” said Lewis. “If people are choosing MAID, choosing to die, because they can’t get the supports they need in life, something is broken in our system.”

He also said he was concerned that the chronic underfunding and under-resourcing of disability supports could be steering disabled Canadians toward MAID.

Lewis, who doesn’t have a seat in Parliament, said that he and the NDP caucus will be discussing the matter internally.



We Don't Have to Trade With China

The apparatus is not for the citizens.

I doubt that is has ever been:

The federal government is refusing to release the full text of a controversial policing agreement between the Royal Canadian Mounted Police and authorities in the People’s Republic of China, despite mounting concerns over foreign interference and transnational repression.

In response to an Order Paper Question submitted by Conservative MP John Williamson, the government confirmed that the 2026 memorandum of understanding between the RCMP and China includes “exchange of information,” “investigative assistance,” “training,” and coordination with other domestic law enforcement agencies.

But Canadians won’t get to see the actual agreement.

The government says the deal will not be tabled in Parliament or released publicly because international law enforcement agreements “require confidentiality.”

There have been years of warnings from intelligence officials about Beijing-linked foreign interference operations in Canada, including allegations involving illegal Chinese police stations operating on Canadian soil.

The government also admitted the agreement allows information sharing under Canada’s legal framework, while insisting the arrangement is guided by “sovereignty, equality, and mutual benefit.”

When asked what consultations were conducted before signing the agreement, the government refused to provide specifics, claiming the information is not centrally tracked and could not be compiled in time without risking “incomplete and misleading information.”


Rather, it is hidden from the public for reasons that make sense to the same government that passes censorship bills and freezes bank accounts.



Nearly Half of Polled Aboriginal Albertans Back Separation

That might prove awkward:



It seems that there is a lot of Albertan discontent to go around.


Your Corrupt, Shadowy, Immoral Government and You

One can only imagine things getting worse:

**

Staff in Prime Minister Mark Carney’s Privy Council Office attended a closed-door March 10 meeting to discuss which reporters would be blacklisted or “accredited,” Access To Information records show. Carney weeks later commemorated World Press Freedom Day by announcing: “A strong, independent and free press both defines and defends our values.”

Lying sack of crap.

**

Liberal MP Lori Idlout (Nunavut) remains a major shareholder in a company that received nearly $600,000 in federal contracts in the past five years, newly-released records show. The company runs Indigenous training workshops for federal employees: “This is a highly specialized training program.”

**

Let's put it another way - this is EXACTLY what they plan on doing:

Cabinet will maintain “advancement of religion” as a charitable purpose under the Income Tax Act, says Finance Minister François-Philippe Champagne. The pledge followed a Commons finance committee report recommending an end to religious charities: “Canada is not considering amending the Act to remove the advancement of religion.”



We Need to Start Electing Our Judges

And binning our legal system.

To wit:

Last month, it wasn’t just a judge who excused a Ghanaian work permit holder for beating a woman in the street over an unpaid loan. It was also the Crown prosecutor.

The 34-year-old, known only as E.A. due to a publication ban, admitted to the Ontario Superior Court of Justice that he lured a woman who owed him money into a basement to demand repayment. The victim’s account was that, at this point, he put her in a choke hold, tried to rape her and took her phone as collateral, but in court only the phone theft was established to have occurred. (E.A. had countered that there was no attempted raping or choking, that the woman had a motive to fabricate such a story, and that the woman chased him out).

Security footage showed them both returning to the street, where they fought until E.A. pushed the woman to the ground and sped off in his car, leaving her alone on a dark, suburban road without a way to contact anyone for help.

Later, at the woman’s request, E.A. returned her phone. But a theft had still occurred, and a jury ultimately convicted him for it.

That left the question of sentence, which was to be answered by Justice Renu Mandhane, who was previously the chair of the Ontario Human Rights Commission, a role she used to champion progressive politics in the Ontario government. She pushed the notion that police were racist based on mere differences in statistics, that race should play an even bigger role in public service hiring and that gender identity should be taught in schools.

Mandhane has been a judge since 2020, and has used her post to continue her activism. In one case last year, for example, involving a Black man accused of possessing an illegal gun, she excluded the gun from trial because she felt the police had been racist despite admitting there was “no direct evidence of racial profiling” to substantiate the accusation. She scrutinized the police officer’s behaviour, found that he fell ever so short of perfection, and concluded he was somehow racist.

She’s not the only Ontario judge to do this: another former racial justice advocate and recent Liberal appointee, Faisal Mirza, has let illegal gun-toting Black men go for similar reasons at least twice.

In the case of E.A., however, Mandhane didn’t have to do much logic-bending to get to a result that let him off easy. Both the man’s defence lawyer and the Crown prosecutor agreed that he should receive a conditional discharge: instead of a conviction, he would be given a few tasks by a probation officer to complete to repent for his actions, and, as long as he fulfilled them, no criminal record.

Mandhane agreed. She noted the sympathetic aspects of his case: he was “relatively youthful” at 34, and didn’t have a criminal record (though, he’d only been in Canada since 2015).

**


The Ontario Superior Court of Justice heard Ajitpal Singh was driving too close behind another truck that lost control and jackknifed on Highway 102 in December 2021, killing the driver of a truck heading in the opposite direction, and severely injuring a passenger.

“Mr. Singh has been living in Canada since 2018, where he has studied and worked to make a life in this country; If convicted, he will almost certainly face deportation, which would be a result unique to Mr. Singh in that no Canadian citizen would face a similar consequence if he or she pleaded guilty to the same crime,” Justice Stephen J. Wojciechowski wrote in a recent decision. 

(Sidebar: three guesses why.) 


“Deportation would be a disproportionate result to the crime which this sentencing hearing is addressing.”

Singh pleaded guilty last November to dangerous operation of a motor vehicle on Dec. 12, 2021.

The Crown was seeking a conviction for Singh with a two-year driving prohibition and a $3,000 fine ...

Singh’s lawyer sought the discharge, with the trucker “making a voluntary payment of $10,000 as a victim fine surcharge or restitution, in addition to agreeing to a driving prohibition for a period of five to 10 years,” said the May 4 decision.

“The Crown’s position was that the discharge requested by the defence would be contrary to the public’s interest. Mr. Singh’s conduct and driving behaviour warrants accountability and a sentence which reflects general deterrence,” said the decision.

This is contempt for the Canadian public.

It is hard to see otherwise.







Monday, May 11, 2026

It's Time To End the Office of Governor-General

I thought that Canada wasn't an extension of the Crown or some European fish market.

Do we have to have Louise Arbour sponging off of us?:

Arbour spent five years on the Supreme Court during the tenure of chief justice Beverly McLachlin, who helped author many of the most disruptive and consequential Supreme Court decisions of the modern era. Race-based sentencing, low-barrier MAID, the catch-and-release bail regime; it all ultimately originates with a decision out of the McLachlin court.

So it’s notable that Arbour’s most memorable contribution during her time as a Supreme Court judge was a dissent arguing that the McLachlin court wasn’t being activist enough.

The case was Gosselin v Quebec, which surrounded a Quebec law that made welfare benefits less generous for residents under 30 as an incentive to encourage younger Quebecers to get a job.

The majority decision, written by McLachlin, rejected the notion that the law was a violation of the Charter right to “equal benefit of the law without discrimination.”

Arbour didn’t just disagree with this, but authored a dissent arguing that welfare was a “positive right” guaranteed under the Charter of Rights of Freedoms. By not paying full freight on welfare benefits to 20-somethings, Quebec had “interfered with their fundamental right to security of the person and perhaps even their right to life,” she wrote. ...

After a series of sexual harassment scandals hit the Canadian Armed Forces in the 2010s, Arbour was picked to head up a review recommending reform.

The resulting Arbour Report, published in 2022, spoke of a culture of “toxic masculinity” within the military, and would find fault in the fact that service members were predominantly composed of white men.

“Members of Indigenous and black communities, and other visible minorities and equity-seeking groups, have been largely absent, clearly not welcome,” reads the report’s opening paragraph.

Arbour would expound on this in press interviews, telling Macleans in 2022 that what the military needed was an injection of “diversity” similar to the identity-based quotas being pursued by universities.

“If you just recruit white boys who like guns but don’t like women or anybody who doesn’t look like them, you’ll perpetuate that culture,” she said.

And indeed, one of the Arbour Report’s recommendations was to start leaning into identity quotas. “The CAF should establish a system of progressive targets for the promotion of women in order to increase the number of women in each rank,” reads recommendation number 36. ...

(Sidebar: what can go wrong?) 

And Arbour has very much been on the pro-migration side of things. So much so, that when in 2016 the Toronto-based Munk Debates needed someone to defend the position that Western countries should admit far more asylum seekers, they called Arbour. Among her arguments was that migration surges would indeed alter Canadian culture, but that this was a good thing. The next generation of Canadians would develop their “own culture, fully open to that of others.”

In 2018, Arbour was serving as UN Special Representative for International Migration when she gave an interview to France24 saying it was only “mythologies, stereotypes, negative attitudes” that were driving Europeans to oppose migration increases.

“The Western world is going to face demographic deficits that are such that Europeans, North Americans will not be able to maintain their standard of living unless they can import part of their workforce at all skill levels,” she said. ...

Between 2004 and 2008, Arbour was UN High Commissioner of Human Rights. The office is notorious for obsessively critiquing every perceived sleight made by Israel, while ignoring or obfuscating the actions of Israel’s enemies, be they Hamas, Hezbollah or Iran.

Arbour was not an exception to this dynamic. She had hinted publicly that Israel was guilty of “war crimes” in its 2006 Lebanon War, while simultaneously dismissing the Hezbollah rockets fired indiscriminately into Israeli territory because they rarely killed anybody.

Her tenure would also see her laud an Arab human rights charter that described Zionism as “racism” (she recanted when that part was shown to her).

When a Danish newspaper was assailed with death threats after publishing cartoons depicting the prophet Mohammed in 2005, Arbour came out against the paper, saying, “I find alarming any behaviours that disregard the beliefs of others.”

 ** 

 

 

Do we really need her? 

 

https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/442021fecc159da1858025e2fbfb597c5ee5317ef189862ea187b5c42b949e89.jpg