Saturday, July 14, 2012

It's Saturday Night

... and you know what that means!






I find it adorable that any Canadian politician thinks he can sway China into anything resembling humanity, especially after getting on one's knees to worship one of China's favourite useful idiots:



Canada's ambassador to China expects to see a change in Chinese foreign policy that could help the United Nations intervene to stop more bloodshed in Syria.

In an interview with guest host James Fitz-Morris airing Saturday morning on CBC Radio's The House, David Mulroney said Canadians "need to see, and we expect to see, change in the way China engages the broader world."

"[Chinese] foreign policy has up until now focused largely on a doctrine of non-interference. That clearly isn't something that is particularly helpful or effective when we're facing a regime like Syria's," Mulroney said, calling on China to join the international community in "committed action."

The United Nations estimates at least 14,000 people have been killed in Syria since March 2011, when an uprising against the regime of President Bashar al-Assad began. Activists put the death toll at several thousand higher than that, offering shocking reports of violence by government forces against not only rebel fighters, but also civilians, including women and very young children.

While sanctions and other diplomatic efforts have been underway for months, China and Russia as permanent members of the UN's Security Council have blocked efforts for the UN to intervene to a greater extent to stop the violence.



Good luck with that.


Related: China undermines UN sanctions against North Korea, has been sending stolen technology into North Korea and has been propping that Stalinist state up. No word on whether Tony Clement will siphon Canadian tax dollars into the Kim Jong-Il Visitor Centre for Understanding and Dynastic Brutality.


PLEASE, PLEASE sign this important petition to give North Korean refugee children a chance at life. They will thank you for it.


(thumbs all the way up)


It wasn't a brawl, gunfight or even a shouting match. It was a "protest":



Islamist gunmen in Mali shot in the air to disperse protesters trying to block them from attending Friday prayers, witnesses said, the latest clash between locals and rebel groups controlling the country's north.
The protest in the town of Goundam, 90 km (56 miles) southwest of Timbuktu, erupted after self-appointed morality police beat a woman for not wearing a headscarf, injuring her baby, the witnesses said.

Most people living in northern Mali have long practised Islam, but frustrations with the strict form of sharia, Islamic law, being imposed by Islamists have sparked several protests.



Perhaps the article writer could enlightened his readers with what a lenient form of Sharia looks like in mad, theocratic states.


Islamist fail (ure) or Reuters fail? You decide?



Oh this little-vetted, instantly praised, least accomplished and terribly incompetent "leader" ought to know:



There are a lot of wealthy, successful Americans who agree with me — because they want to give something back. They know they didn’t — look, if you’ve been successful, you didn’t get there on your own. You didn’t get there on your own. I’m always struck by people who think, well, it must be because I was just so smart. There are a lot of smart people out there. It must be because I worked harder than everybody else. 

Let me tell you something — there are a whole bunch of hardworking people out there. If you were successful, somebody along the line gave you some help. There was a great teacher somewhere in your life. Somebody helped to create this unbelievable American system that we have that allowed you to thrive. Somebody invested in roads and bridges. If you’ve got a business — you didn’t build that. Somebody else made that happen.



There is no limit to this man's arrogance. It's just vomit-inducing. That someone worked hard to get where they are must astonish one such as him who has had things handed to him.


Hopefully his @$$ in November.



Let's stop the pretense. Tae kwon do classes would be a better use of resources:



New anti-bullying legislation coming to Ontario schools in September is a step in the right direction, but hopes that it will eliminate bullying completely are unrealistic, say education advocates.

"I'm not really sure you can eradicate it," admits Annie Kidder, executive director of the Toronto-based group People for Education.

Nonetheless, she says, the Accepting Schools Act, which passed last month in the Ontario legislature, gives school administrators and teachers an opportunity to address not only victims of bullying, but the bullies themselves.

Kidder says this distinction shows that lawmakers get the big picture — that bullying is a complex problem that doesn't just go away by punishing the perpetrators.

"What we really need to be working on in our schools is kids' mental and social health, because bullying is really a relationship in a way," she says. "We have to deal with the bullied and the bullies."


But it was never about bullying, was it?




And now, fashion ads for the Seventies that will make you wonder.


16 comments:

balbulican said...

Interesting. So what do you propose as a foreign policy alternative to what Nixon/Kissinger used to call "constructive engagement"? A return to isolation?

Osumashi Kinyobe said...

Yes, I would.

Isolate China and the following happens:

-North American industry resurges
-North Korea collapses and eventually reunites with the south
-Vietnam, Cuba and Venezuela and various rogue states in Africa and the Middle East have lost a valuable ally
-Vietnam, the Philippines, Taiwan and even Japan get their maritime sovereignty back
-the Chinese start to overthrow a cruel and repressive government

All that by isolating a communist dictatorship.

balbulican said...

Thanks. I was curious.

Osumashi Kinyobe said...

Curious about what, as there is nothing to this.

balbulican said...

I was curious about whether you actually had a pragmatic, workable alternative for leveraging social and economic change in China.

Osumashi Kinyobe said...

I'm sure you do so please outline it. You've spent a considerable amount of time defending the communist Bethune. Some people might be ashamed.

balbulican said...

Oh, I actually agree with Nixon. I have a bit more faith in the salutory power of capitalism and entrepreneurship than you do. China will change at a much slower rate than any of use would like to see, but the difference between the country I saw on my first trip in 1985 and now is staggering.

Osumashi Kinyobe said...

That has been said time and time again. Without a change in government, you have no change in China. Not even its current ability to be grossly materialist will last long.

balbulican said...

Interesting. What are the indicators you are using to measure "change"? Are you suggesting that indices like lifespan, infant mortality,social mobility, literacy, levels of education (especially post-secondary), privatization, individual and family income, GNP and so on have NOT improved since Mao?

Osumashi Kinyobe said...

What happens when China's population implodes, its impoverished and not democratised peasant population revolts, its ability to trade and spy on its trading partners is hampered, it cannot control North Korea or India marches it into the ocean? What indicators do I need to imagine what would happen then?

balbulican said...

My point is that there HAS been change in China since the death of Mao, and that the indicators I listed have all improved significantly. No enough, but lots. So I don't understand your comment that "no change will happen".

I can't predict the future (nor, I assume, can you). Since 1949 pundits have been predicting the demise of the Communist Regime in China. I see no great likelihood of a population implosion (given that one-family/one child is one the wane), of a massive peasant revolt (I think slow democratization is more probable), of a North Korea suddenly challenging China (really??), of an India suddenly taking on a nuclear neighbour. We can set up nightmare scenarios with equal plausibility for any country on the planet. But my point is that change HAS happened, IS happening, and in all likelihood will continue to happen, in all the areas I listed.

Osumashi Kinyobe said...

No, there hasn't been. Mao is dead. His successors are not. Let them have free elections. Let them enjoy the same freedoms we do. Remove them from the Security Council. Penalise them for every political prisoner, dead infant, forced abortion and dead North Korean.

balbulican said...

"No, there hasn't been."

No there hasn't been WHAT? Are you suggesting that lifespan, infant mortality,social mobility, literacy, levels of education (especially post-secondary), privatization, individual and family income, and GNP stats have NOT improved since Mao's death?

Osumashi Kinyobe said...

The average life span in China is marginal:

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/11/24/business/global/24leonhardt.html

Advanced educational opportunities and social mobility are directly related to how many factories your dad owns, the workers therein getting paid six cents an hour. As if giving a small group of people purchasing power changes their political situation.

Things certainly haven't changed for a people who have ONE party (a communist one), a massive armed force, no basic freedoms, trafficked organs, forcibly repatriated (if not killed)North Koreans, major pollution and poor, if at all existing, infrastructure.

Let China have a multi-party system and no firewalls. Let's see if the party likes that.

balbulican said...

Shrug. You're simply ignoring data that gets in the way of your Manichean world view. No problem - but why on earth do you blog?

Osumashi Kinyobe said...

That sounds like the cry of the perpetually deluded and full-of-themselves.