Tuesday, April 26, 2022

It Was Never About A Virus

Nope:

**

Canada’s health-care system is not properly tracking COVID vaccine injuries, a B.C. family doctor says, and he is discouraged because his efforts to report and investigate the side effects seen in his patients have been ignored, he says.

Dr. Charles Hoffe, based in Lytton, a village 260 km northeast of Vancouver, garnered publicity after he wrote an open letter in April 2021 to B.C.’s Provincial Health Officer Dr. Bonnie Henry highlighting what he said were serious side effects in his small community from the Moderna COVID vaccine, along with the challenges he faced getting feedback from the Ministry of Health.

“I had just tried to report the vaccine injuries in my own patients and I’ve sort of given up, I got so despondent,” he told The Epoch Times. “They just arbitrarily decide this is a coincidence without ever having examined the patient.”

Dr. Hoffe said this is the opposite of what one would expect from medical authorities for such a novel treatment.

“The fact that the vaccines are experimental should mean they should be very, very vigilant about any possible adverse effect. You should have a much higher index of suspicion of harm from an experimental treatment than from something else that’s been around for years,” he said.

But “it was exactly the opposite. In Canada, they would say there’s no way of proving this is from the vaccine networks and it can’t be from the vaccine. So they sort of gave this special dispensation of confidence to these vaccines that they’ve never given to any other medical treatment before. Logic and ethics have just gone out the window.”

The BC Centre for Disease Control (BCCDC), for its part, says that “post-marketing vaccine surveillance of safety on a population level is needed to help ensure vaccine safety” and that such a system is in place for the COVID-19 vaccine.

 

This BC:

 

Moving on ...

 

The Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV) in China has the right to make a partnering U.S. lab wipe all data arising from their collaborative work, a legal document reveals.

**

While the researcher known as Little Mountain Dog began to suspect the virus was spreading, the government was already trying to keep it quiet. On Dec. 30, a doctor at Wuhan Central Hospital named Li Wenliang shared evidence in a chat group that patients in his hospital were being treated for a SARS-like virus. He and other doctors were summoned by the police and warned not to spread “rumors.”

And that silence persisted until Jan. 20 when the spread of COVID was first mentioned on state media. Wuhan was finally locked down on Jan. 23. So nearly a full month had passed between the time researchers first alerted people a SARS-like virus had been identified and any real attempt to manage it or warn people about it. And as we all know, by that point it was too late. The virus had already spread to other parts of the world, including the US. You can’t help but wonder how things might have turned out if China had acted swiftly instead of secretly early on.

 

This is Canada-level obfuscation. 



Keep the masks on, cries the quack:

A federal mask mandate for air travelers now in its third year should not be repealed, says Dr. Theresa Tam. The chief public health officer called masks inconvenient but necessary: ‘If everybody’s going to be wearing a mask, why not?’

 

 

No comments: