Why We Can Never Be United

Any country that deliberately factionalises its population into tribes along artificial or fanciful lines of identity cannot be united. 

This is the soft-gloved and self-inflicted version of segregation, that appalling regulation that stands as the antithesis of unity and tolerance.  

(Sidebar: take a good look at how Jews are treated in this country under the official policy of political multiculturalism.  How is that working out? Are there no Canadians to reject this violence and exclusion? When do we arrive at the internment camp stage of our national devolution? After all, some weren't really Canadian, right?)

People are rejecting the de facto and largely unspoken New World code of rejecting castes and bloodlines, instead embracing unity along national lines, joining together for causes that are common and arguably more pressing than romantic and even ethnocentric notions that serve only to divide and blur what is supposed to be beneficial about one's everyday social and political reality in new countries that one's ancestors found themselves lucky to be apart of? This is to say nothing of adhering to old hatreds or traditions that do not gel with twenty-first century life.

In other words, why be a dowdy, old Canadian, which means nothing, when one can claim membership into a country or ethnic or racial group that one's forebearers rejected for an ostensibly better life?:

Almost two-thirds of Canadians say they are attached to their ethnic origins or ancestry, according to a new survey conducted by Leger for the Association for Canadian Studies (ACS). However, attachment to being Canadian remains considerably stronger, the survey shows.

(Sidebar: because that Canadian passport is darned convenient when getting out of Dodge.) 

Attachment to ancestry is widespread across the country. It reaches 67 per cent in Quebec and Atlantic Canada, 66 per cent in British Columbia and 65 per cent in Ontario. In Alberta, and Saskatchewan and Manitoba, 57 per cent said they are attached to their ethnic origins.

The survey found that 64 per cent of Canadians say they are attached to their ancestry, including 28 per cent who described themselves as “very attached.” Quebecers and British Columbians are the most likely to say they are “very attached” to their ancestry, at 33 and 32 per cent respectively.

(Sidebar: quelle surprise.) 

“British Columbia’s relatively high ‘very attached’ result is more likely connected to its demographic diversity, immigration history and sizeable Asian, European and Indigenous populations,” Jack Jedwab, president of the ACS, told National Post in an email. “Many British Columbians may have relatively recent or clearly identifiable ancestral connections.”

(Sidebar: aaahhh, the race card.) 

Meanwhile, 82 per cent of Canadians told Leger that they are attached to Canada, including 50 per cent who are very attached. Though, there are significant regional differences. Attachment to Canada climbs to 92 per cent in Atlantic Canada, compared with 73 per cent in Quebec. In Alberta, 84 per cent feel attachment to Canada. It was 88 per cent in B.C., and Saskatchewan and Manitoba.

(Sidebar: for what reason?) 

The survey reflects some generational differences in that Canadians aged 18 to 24 (36 per cent) and 55 to 64 (34 per cent) are almost equally “very attached” to their ethnic origins and ancestry, while respondents in the age groups in between are less likely to say they are “very attached” (between 22 and 24 per cent).

(Sidebar: this division was taught and the response to it will be reactionary instead of logical.) 

“Among those age 18-24, ancestry may be especially relevant because identity is being explored and actively defined,” Jedwab said. “Younger Canadians have also grown up in an environment where ethnic identity, diversity and cultural recognition are openly discussed.” For survey respondents aged 55 to 64, Jedwab said, “attachment may reflect a later-life return to genealogy, inherited traditions and memories of parents or grandparents. Some members of this cohort are also immigrants or children of postwar immigrants for whom ancestral culture remains personally significant.”

 The survey also looked at gaps between attachment to Canada and ancestry. For example, among the youngest and oldest cohorts this gap was identical at 22 points. Though, this represents different considerations, says Jedwab. “Among 18–24-year-olds, attachment to both identities is substantial: 85 per cent are attached to Canada and 63 per cent to their ancestry. Their Canadian attachment is broad but comparatively less intense. Only 40 per cent say they are ‘very attached’ to Canada. In effect, young Canadians can value ancestry while still regarding Canada as the larger political and social community to which they belong.”

 

(Sidebar: ergo, superficial.)