Isn't there anyone here who works for Canada?:
The Commission on Foreign Interference yesterday said Chinese Communist Party operatives may have helped elect a handful of MPs in the last two national campaigns. While misconduct would not have skewed the overall results, “we must remain vigilant because the threat of foreign interference is real,” said Justice Marie-Josée Hogue.
The China WAS controlling our elections and no one did anything about it!
You were covering for your former boss' kid, you termagant.
That takes priority over Canada, evidently.
**
Prime Minister Justin Trudeau’s claim of “explosive” top secret evidence linking the Conservative Party to foreign agents was dismissed yesterday by the Commission on Foreign Interference. The Commission made a scant, two-paragraph reference to the claim in its 860-page report: “The Prime Minister spoke.”
**
Defence Minister Bill Blair “dropped the ball” in a police investigation of Chinese contacts with the Liberal Party, the Commission on Foreign Interference said yesterday. A report cited legitimate suspicions over unusual inactivity in Blair’s office as public safety minister in 2021: “Concerns are legitimate and understandable.”
Also:
Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre is rejecting the terms of a briefing from Canada's spy agency regarding foreign interference because it won't enable him to act on the information, his office says.
The Canadian Security Intelligence Service (CSIS) said in December that it was looking to share "some information to the leader of the Official Opposition through a threat reduction measure."
But a spokesperson for Poilievre said Tuesday that the Conservative leader wouldn't be able to act upon the information he received from the CSIS briefing.
Which is precisely why he won't get a clearance.
The liars and the enablers of those liars hold several veils of secrecy over the public and no one seems to mind.
The Liberals plan on torching everything down and salting the earth where everything once stood.
But don't take my word for it:
Slightly more than half of respondents (51 per cent) said they were not confident that a new Liberal leader would actually eliminate the consumer carbon tax. Only 36 per cent said they believed it.
**
NDP Leader Jagmeet Singh said Tuesday he is open to working with the Liberal government to pass relief measures for workers if U.S. President Donald Trump moves ahead with devastating tariffs on Canadian goods.
Singh has said for weeks he and his MPs will vote to bring down the government and send Canadians to an election at the earliest opportunity when Parliament reconvenes after prorogation in March.
Singh said that commitment still stands — but he opened the door to propping up the Liberals long enough to pass relief legislation.
If you let the Liberals do that, Jag, there will be no money for your pension, the only thing you DO care about.
**
To think that they voted for this:
The official rate of Canadians 65 and older living in poverty is six per cent.But the number could be more than double that, new research warns.Fourteen per cent of Canadians in that age demographic are living in “poverty-level conditions,” according to the “Ageing in Canada” survey released today by the National Institute on Ageing and Environics Institute for Survey Research.
The Impact Assessment Act was introduced to stall and then completely stop natural resource development.
Try threatening Trump with no resources:
There has never been a shortage of extractable fuels in Canada, nor has there been a lack of demand for it on the world stage. Why is Canada, rich in natural gas, oil, and critical minerals, failing to meet the global demand for energy?
It is surely not for lack of demand, with oil and gas predicted to make up 46 per cent of the world’s energy supply in 2050.
And in recent years, Germany, Japan, South Korea, and Taiwan have reached out to Canada begging (or requesting) natural gas only to be rebuffed or met with disappointment. Infamously, Prime Minister Justin Trudeau’s asserted that there was no “business case” for supplying LNG to the EU.
By stifling the energy industry with more layers of regulation like the IAA, we are denying energy security and a better standard of living to both ourselves and our friends. Even before the stricter regulations of the IAA were introduced by the government in 2019, the deliberate delays and outright hostility to energy development in Canada were evident.
Between 2011 and 2022, there were 18 proposals for LNG export facilities. Only one, the LNG Canada project near Kitimat, has made meaningful progress. Even so, it took seven years for LNG Canada to get through all necessary approvals and its final investment decision.
There have been far more cancellations and failures tarnishing Canada’s record. In 2017, Petronas cancelled the massive $36 billion Pacific NorthWest LNG project. Then in 2020, a year after the IAA received Royal assent, Warren Buffet himself chose to abandon a $9 billion LNG project in Quebec.
In 2021, Chevron and Woodside Energy, both shareholders in LNG Canada’s export facility at Kitimat, pulled their funding and redirected it to other projects, but not before identifying regulatory uncertainty as the culprit.
Compare that to the United States, where seven LNG export facilities were built in the same timeframe, five more began construction, and fifteen more were approved. Germany built its first floating LNG terminal in just one year, during 2022, following the Russian invasion of Ukraine that severely curbed the imports of Russian gas.
Canada’s falling so far behind, despite our vast wealth and nearly two dozen proposals for LNG facilities, is the result of the choices made by the government when it comes to regulating the energy sector, and the resource sector more broadly.
Former prime minister Stephen Harper did not defund the CBC when he had the chance:
The CBC engaged in a “blatant lack of balance” in covering a dispute between Catholics and LGBTQ advocates, a network ombudsman said yesterday. The censure for breach of the CBC’s own code of conduct followed a 2023 story that “could reasonably lead one to perceive some degree of bias.”
Quebec - the spoiled child of the country and whose very existence, whittled down to the language, is politically and economically propped up - declares that the shibboleth of political multiculturalism just doesn't fit in with the province:
The minister responsible for immigration has justified the presentation of new legislation on the integration of immigrants by saying he wants to promote a common Quebec culture and less “ghettoization” of new arrivals.
Jean-François Roberge, the minister of immigration, francization and integration, said the legislation he will table Thursday will act as a counterweight to the Canadian concept of multiculturalism, which he said remains a bad fit because it fails to clearly define a common culture with principles Quebec believes in.
Balkanisation was brought in by your favourite son, Pierre Trudeau, Quebec.
How did that work out for you?
Suck it.
Also - is this the Trump Effect?:
As radical anti-Israel rallies continue to be a feature of Canadian downtowns even in the wake of a Gazan ceasefire, Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre proposed on Monday to begin deporting non-citizens participating in hate activities.
Yes, please.
Ontario Premier Doug Ford officially set a provincial election in motion Tuesday for Feb. 27, more than a year before the next fixed election date.
The election had been set for June 2026, but Ford said he needs a new mandate to deal with four years of a Donald Trump presidency in the United States.
Ford has said Trump’s threat to impose 25 per cent tariffs on Canadian goods would hit Ontario and its auto sector hard, and the provincial government would need to spend tens of billions of dollars to protect jobs and the economy.
Bluster, Doug.
That's all you have.
Now, I was under the impression that with a name like "Captain America", one would embrace all that the character is meant to stand for and not try to burnish the image of anyone or anything else.
At the very least, just shut up and promote the movie, not one's politics.
Either out of his own volition or because he got a talking to from Disney higher ups, Captain America: Brave New World star Anthony Mackie has attempted to offer a particularly patriotic clarification to his previous criticism regarding the Star-Spangled Avenger and what he “represents” as a character.
As previously reported, the star of the next Marvel Cinematic Universe entry recently found himself making headlines following his appearance at January 27th Brave New World press event – the first of the film’s pre-release media tour – in Rome, Italy.
Per a video shared by Italian entertainment news website The Redheads Diaries, in reply to being asked by an attendee as to just what Captain America ‘represented’ to him personally, Mackie asserted, “For me, Captain America represents a lot of different things and I don’t think the term, you know, ‘America’, should be one of those representations.”
“It’s about a man who keeps his word, who has honor, dignity and integrity,” he explained. “Someone who is trustworthy and dependable.”
(Sidebar: everyone loves a hero who is generic and never stands out!)
Unfortunately, Mackie did not follow this train of thought any further, as after sharing his opinion he immediately pivoted to a non sequitur discussion about how his upcoming outing as the MCU’s second Captain America was “kind of like an aspect of a dream coming true.” ...
Unsurprisingly, Mackie’s read of Captain America’s character was met with a wave of backlash from fans, who took issue with the actor seemingly implying that the hero’s patriotic theme automatically led him to be an enforcer for a specific political ideology or ideologue despite it being a long-established fact that he is “loyal to nothing except the dream”.
Perhaps a dream of chorus girls but still a dream: