***
A surprise in every post.
Iranian President
Mahmoud Ahmadinejad said on Monday Israel has no roots in the Middle East and would be "eliminated," ignoring a U.N. warning to avoid incendiary
rhetoric ahead of the annual General Assembly session.
Ahmadinejad also said he did not take seriously the threat that
Israel could launch a military strike on Iran's nuclear facilities, denied
sending arms to Syria, and alluded to Iran's threats to the life of British
author Salman Rushdie.
The United States
quickly dismissed the Iranian president's comments as "disgusting,
offensive and outrageous."
Israeli Prime Minister
Benjamin Netanyahu has hinted Israel could strike Iran's nuclear sites and criticized U.S. President Barack Obama's
position that sanctions and diplomacy should be given more time to stop Tehran
from acquiring nuclear weapons.
Iran denies it is
seeking nuclear arms and says its atomic work is peaceful and aimed at
generating electricity.
"Fundamentally we
do not take seriously the threats of the Zionists,"
Ahmadinejad, in New York for this week's U.N. General Assembly, told reporters.
"We have all the defensive means at our disposal and we are ready to defend
ourselves."
There would be no need to “eliminate” Israel if its
“Zionist” threats are not worth taking seriously. Even the Coward-in-Chief’s
sanctions could work if given time. Why,
Iran
has even stopped building its nuclear arsenal. Something must be ready to
give.
Withdraw today, Canada.
President Barack Obama
urged world leaders on Tuesday to put an end to the intolerance and violence
that led to the recent killing of the U.S. ambassador in Libya and warned Iran
he would do what it takes to prevent Tehran from getting nuclear arms.
In a 30-minute address
to the 193-nation U.N. General Assembly, Obama called anew for the ouster of
Syrian President Bashar al-Assad following an 18-month civil war without saying
how to make it happen. He also offered no fresh ideas on solving the
Israeli-Palestinian conflict.
Beginning and ending
his remarks by evoking Christopher Stevens, the U.S. ambassador to Libya who
died with three other Americans in a September 11 assault on the American
Consulate in Benghazi, Obama called on nations to fight such violence.
"Today, we must
affirm that our future will be determined by people like Chris Stevens, and not
by his killers," said Obama, who seeks re-election on November 6.
"Today, we must declare that this violence and intolerance has no place
among our United Nations."
While condemning the
violence sparked by a video made in California that depicts the Prophet
Mohammad as a womanizer, fool and child abuser, several Muslim leaders called
for international action to outlaw acts of blasphemy.
U.S. missions also
came under attack in Egypt, Tunisia, Indonesia and other Muslim nations.
Obama - while
repeating his condemnations of the video as "crude and disgusting" and stressing that the U.S. government had
nothing to do with its production - staunchly defended free speech.
(
Sidebar:
the
video is a red herring. The plan to kill
the
poorly defended ambassador
was
already devised. And, really, if you’re that emotionally retarded that you
would riot over a video no one has seen, you deserve to live in a hellhole run
into the ground by equally emotionally retarded crooks and liars who drum up
“Zionist” boogey-men distractions whenever they cannot feed their own
population or just deal with the fact that women are capable of going shopping
without male owners watching their every step.)
Further evidence that
this
man is not fit to water a fern let alone lead the United States for
any period of time, let alone another
four years. Americans, do yourselves- and the world- a favour and really,
really consider what the past four years
were like and what things will be like if this jack@$$ gets re-elected. You owe
it to yourselves to be able to put food in your stomachs, gas in your car and
to hold your heads high.
The demand to include
Islamic teaching in Catholic schools is proving controversial again. A few
months ago, the Education Department in Tegal District (Central Java) warned St
Pius Catholic Schools to include Islamic courses for Muslim students. …
The situation is
critical because the sisters of the St Pius Catholic Schools have received
threats and warnings, including the threat of having their schools shut down if
they do not comply with the requests.
But that inaccurate description would just be plain nutty,
not to mention heretical, if not apostate.
See- you CAN
include Islam in Catholic religion classes.
A watchdog group with
a history of exposing the taxpayer costs of President Obama’s vacations is now
suing the Secret Service for records detailing how much it cost the agency
to protect first daughter Malia Obama when she traveled to Mexico for spring
break earlier this year.
It’s a trip that the White House has famously tried to keep out of the
news.
The
group Judicial Watch announced on Tuesday that it has filed the lawsuit,
known as Judicial Watch v. U.S. Secret Service, for the records. The
agency has so far, according to the group, not responded to a Freedom of
Information Act request made on March 29.
The White House has
gone out of its way to stop news outlets from reporting on the trip. When Malia
Obama went on the Mexico vacation in March, the White House reportedly forced a
number of news organizations to remove their stories online reporting on the
trip.
Kenney is one of the
government's most prominent cabinet ministers and the only one to say publicly
that he is in favour of studying the Criminal Code's definition of when life
begins. He said Monday that he would vote in favour of Motion 312, put forward by Conservative MP Stephen Woodworth, to create a parliamentary committee to
study the definition.
The vote is scheduled
for tomorrow night.
NDP MP Niki Ashton, the party's critic on status of women, says she's
concerned a cabinet minister has said he supports the motion, calling that support
"in clear opposition" to Prime Minister Stephen Harper's longstanding
position that no one wants to see the debate re-opened.
"Not only has the
debate been opened through this private members motion coming forward, but ...
a senior member of this government has clearly stated his support," Ashton
said. …
Clearly people DO
want to talk about this so they might as well dispense with their usual
avoidance and rhetorical crap and catch up to the twenty-first century. That
now the NDP critic would support Stephen Harper shows the mettle of her and her
party’s convictions.