Not a weapon but a strategy.
Putting aside how emotionally retarded Canadians are, how their stomachs vote according to tribes and how cultural Marxism has made entire populations incapable of critical thinking and self-reflection, thus making a new Macdonald or Lincoln next to non-existent, for any political leader or party to survive, it has stop playing by the rules of a rigged game and go out swinging.
This means that they have to stop caring what everyone says and start telling the unvarnished truth or lose not only an election but a country and a civilisation.
Tory federal leader Andrew Scheer needs to man up quick or spend whatever remains of Canada's life sitting across from a frat-boy so useless that even his Chinese bosses are seriously re-thinking his usefulness.
When Scheer removed MP Michael Cooper from the justice committee after calling out gross deceits from a Muslim witness who equated conservatism with violence at a committee hearing on extremism.
Cooper was right to call out Faisal Khan Suri (from the special-interest group, Alberta Muslim Public Affairs Council) for the erroneous connections between conservatism and the actions of one mass shooter whose comments and ideologies are no more fixed than any indecisive millennial whose views change on whim. Cooper should have gone further and pointed out how Islamism has infiltrated the West to such an extent that motions like M-103, meant to prohibit any criticism of the religion that expressly directs its adherents to attack and kill non-believers, are virtually mandatory.
Scheer's removal of Cooper says the following: that he will not defend his own party, he will not support the telling of the truth and that he will bow to pressure whenever it presents itself. I'm surprised that (as of this writing) Scheer hasn't fallen to his knees in contrition for saying that: "
We are all children of God and there is equal and infinite value in all of us.". Knowing how utterly phobic Canadians are of people who actually believe things, I'm sure an impromptu mob of apology-demanders and stone-throwers will be assembled shortly.
If Scheer won't stand up for his own people or defend the obvious, why should anyone vote for him? By backing down, he has given the useless frat-boy a much-needed boon.
Instead, Scheer should take a page from "Harper-era" (SEE: Canadians, fear-mongering, emotional retardation, paranoia) former minister, Bernard Valcourt, and call the inflammatory and factually-inaccurate report on missing women "propagandist":
To wit: the government of Canada refused to call the targeting, abduction, abuse and murder of the Yazidis and Middle Eastern Christians genocide.
It also bears repeating that more aboriginal men go missing than women and that aboriginal women are more likely to be abused or killed by their own fellows.
But I digress ...
Valcourt will probably be booted from the party but I'm sure he doesn't care. He had the wontons to call the report a waste and an inflammatory accusation against an entire country.
If Big Aboriginal really cared about the plight of the people it claims to serve, it would demand the complete abolition of the Indian Act which has done more to isolate the aboriginal community than any one act of the majority.
Any takers?
Putting aside how emotionally retarded Canadians are, how their stomachs vote according to tribes and how cultural Marxism has made entire populations incapable of critical thinking and self-reflection, thus making a new Macdonald or Lincoln next to non-existent, for any political leader or party to survive, it has stop playing by the rules of a rigged game and go out swinging.
This means that they have to stop caring what everyone says and start telling the unvarnished truth or lose not only an election but a country and a civilisation.
Tory federal leader Andrew Scheer needs to man up quick or spend whatever remains of Canada's life sitting across from a frat-boy so useless that even his Chinese bosses are seriously re-thinking his usefulness.
When Scheer removed MP Michael Cooper from the justice committee after calling out gross deceits from a Muslim witness who equated conservatism with violence at a committee hearing on extremism.
Cooper was right to call out Faisal Khan Suri (from the special-interest group, Alberta Muslim Public Affairs Council) for the erroneous connections between conservatism and the actions of one mass shooter whose comments and ideologies are no more fixed than any indecisive millennial whose views change on whim. Cooper should have gone further and pointed out how Islamism has infiltrated the West to such an extent that motions like M-103, meant to prohibit any criticism of the religion that expressly directs its adherents to attack and kill non-believers, are virtually mandatory.
Scheer's removal of Cooper says the following: that he will not defend his own party, he will not support the telling of the truth and that he will bow to pressure whenever it presents itself. I'm surprised that (as of this writing) Scheer hasn't fallen to his knees in contrition for saying that: "
We are all children of God and there is equal and infinite value in all of us.". Knowing how utterly phobic Canadians are of people who actually believe things, I'm sure an impromptu mob of apology-demanders and stone-throwers will be assembled shortly.
If Scheer won't stand up for his own people or defend the obvious, why should anyone vote for him? By backing down, he has given the useless frat-boy a much-needed boon.
Instead, Scheer should take a page from "Harper-era" (SEE: Canadians, fear-mongering, emotional retardation, paranoia) former minister, Bernard Valcourt, and call the inflammatory and factually-inaccurate report on missing women "propagandist":
Bernard Valcourt, who was Aboriginal affairs minister from 2013 until the defeat of the Harper government in the fall of 2015, blasted the inquiry's conclusion that the thousands of murdered and missing Indigenous women and girls were victims of a wider "Canadian genocide" inflicted on Indigenous people."How far do those activists will go? What has been the cost to Canadians for this propagandist report? What have we learned that we did not already know?" said Valcourt, who now lives in Edmundston, N.B., in a tweet posted on Friday evening."Who feels better in Canada among First Nations for that thunderous silly conclusion that all we wanted was to kill them all?"Valcourt faced an immediate backlash on Twitter that continued into Sunday. That included reaction from leading Indigenous voices like Cindy Blacksock, who heads the First Nation Child and Family Caring Society, and Pam Palmater, chair of Indigenous governance at Ryerson University in Toronto.
Valcourt remained unbowed during a Sunday morning interview with CBC News."I take offence to Canada being accused of genocide. My comprehension of genocide is measured by what genocide really is," said Valcourt. "I don't think it serves any purpose to call the action of the government genocide because it was not genocide."Valcourt said "First Nations got a bad rap from colonialism that has given birth to this country."But he said that using the word genocide "won't solve anything."
To wit: the government of Canada refused to call the targeting, abduction, abuse and murder of the Yazidis and Middle Eastern Christians genocide.
It also bears repeating that more aboriginal men go missing than women and that aboriginal women are more likely to be abused or killed by their own fellows.
But I digress ...
Valcourt will probably be booted from the party but I'm sure he doesn't care. He had the wontons to call the report a waste and an inflammatory accusation against an entire country.
If Big Aboriginal really cared about the plight of the people it claims to serve, it would demand the complete abolition of the Indian Act which has done more to isolate the aboriginal community than any one act of the majority.
Any takers?
No comments:
Post a Comment