When One Thinks Of Coronavirus Screw-Up, Think of Canada!

The global house arrest was supposed to end after two weeks.

We are in Year Two:

“Canada’s f—-d right,” said Rogan. “They’re so locked-down and I don’t understand why they think that’s good.”

I don't, either.

Before someone points out that a radio personality is hardly qualified to make such conclusions, I would like to point out that Canadians - the sheepish, weak-willed, unimaginative and stubbornly leftist - put their faith in so-called experts that told them that masks should not be worn and then they should and then people should triple the masks they wear even when scientific studies demonstrated that they and standing several feet part had no effect on whether one would become infected with a Chinese-spread virus for which there is an over ninety percent survivability rate.

(Sidebar: for comparison, observe the infection and mortality rates for the measles, a far more infectious disease.)

So there's that.

Though Justin has his hangers-on who insist that his experience snowboarding has prepared him for the fabulous job he's done keeping people inside and not letting herd immunity become a thing, others find fault in everything he does:

Prime Minister Justin Trudeau may not be able to attend the G7 meeting in Britain in June, because he may not be eligible to receive his second shot until Aug. 28, due to Canada’s four-month dosage-delay policy. And it’s entirely the prime minister’s fault. This week, Ottawa doubled-down on its policy of treating the population like human guinea pigs by opening the door to mixing vaccines. This is playing jazz with Canadian lives.

No, Canadians are letting him do this.

There is a difference.

**

Liberal MP Ryan Turnbull: "Curve after curve, wave after wave, we as Canadians have been behind... We are behind the curve every time."

Why would he say that, I wonder?

**

Prime Minister Justin Trudeau sounded committed to the idea of a vaccine passport for incoming travellers, but added that implementing the idea would require cooperation from like-minded countries.

Like India or China?:

As the epidemic in India continues to spread, many countries have made plans to evacuate their citizens. But Chinese citizens working in India are prohibited from returning to China. Chinese expats said the CCP (Chinese Communist Party) told India not to issue travel permits to Chinese citizens.

**

Analysts argue that China is legally responsible for the pandemic. Harvard Law professor James Kraska wrote in March: “As the novel coronavirus incubated in Wuhan from mid-December to mid-January, the Chinese state made evidently intentional misrepresentations to its people concerning the outbreak, providing false assurances to the population preceding the approach of the Lunar New Year celebrations on Jan. 25.”

China expert Gordon Chang wrote in an email that the country “intentionally spread COVID-19 beyond its borders,” and called it a form of “mass murder.” He provided three major reasons for this conclusion.

First, “the regime tried to convince the world that COVID-19 was not human-to-human transmissible when it knew that it was.”

Second, after Beijing admitted the disease’s transmissibility, “it then attempted to convince the world that the disease would not lead to many infections and deaths when it knew that it already had, thereby misleading public health officials into not taking precautions they otherwise would have adopted.”

And third, “China pressured [other countries] to not impose travel restrictions and quarantines when it was locking down its own country.”

According to Chang, “Beijing simultaneously arguing that countries should not ban Chinese travelers while maintaining lockdowns unmistakably suggests an intent to spread the disease beyond China’s borders.” He argues that China “saw how COVID-19 had crippled China. If they wanted to cripple other societies with the virus, they would have done what they in fact did …. They maliciously spread the virus to the world.”

According to Chang’s source, China’s National Health Commission ordered every lab, hospital, and other research facility in China to destroy samples of the coronavirus on Jan. 3. The intention could have been to destroy evidence. Chang said the destruction of samples was contrary to best practices during an epidemic. “The universal practice is to keep samples, especially during the early stages of an epidemic when they are needed for contact tracing and vaccine development.”