Thursday, August 04, 2022

It Was Never About a Virus

Quite:

The earliest reported infection, discovered in a preserved nasopharyngeal sample of a 4 year-old boy, happened before 21 November 2019 – in Milan (MI). By November at the latest, we can be confident that the virus was circulating in Milan. By the time of this map, though, the hot spots all appear to be in a roughly equidistant ring around Milan. By the end of February, the only places the virus is still accelerating, is in the still further outlying regions – places like Como, Mantova and Sondrio. It looks for all the world like the virus had burned through Milan without anybody noticing at all, and when the Tomas Pueyos of the world descended upon us with their mass testing and their lockdowns, they were a few months too late. The hotspots they found were secondary infection sites at best.

By the time pandemicists started rooting through their bag of tricks, the virus had been circulating for months with nobody noticing. This is one of the most crucial and eagerly ignored facts of the whole pandemic. Those early patients were hospitalised at very high rates and – in accordance with Chinese advice – subjected to aggressive mechanical ventilation, which killed a great many of them. Maestri, Patient 1, was a 38 year-old recreational marathoner, and he probably would’ve had far less trouble with SARS-2, had he not made the grave mistake of testing positive. Alas, he almost died after spending weeks on a ventilator.

These are at least some of the reasons why our media and our public health officials are desperate to forget those early days. In March 2020, real infections were already in decline. The apparent surge in infection numbers was an illusion caused by the introduction of mass testing programs. Mass containment made everything worse. 

** 

“In October last year, the College became aware that I had been writing exemptions for patients,” said Dr. O’Connor, “and they contacted me and said that they wanted the names and charts of these patients. This is completely going against all the legal rights of my patients, both the right to choose their medical treatment and also their privacy rights.” 

The College also assigned a team of four investigators to Dr. O’Connor, who had been fielding hundreds of calls from patients “looking for exemptions from masks, PCR tests, and vaccines. “These people knew the truth. The majority of them were being coerced at work and didn’t want to take it.” Initially, Dr. O’Connor issued these exemptions based on patient medical history to those with pre-existing conditions such as blood clots. Still, the College changed the criteria: subsequently, exemptions were only to be issued to those who had already had an adverse reaction to their first vaccine.



No comments: