Imagine A Boot Stamping On Transparency Forever

The party that promised transparency also demonstrated its obedience to China:

The revelation that Guilbeault had not received any letters of support came from an Inquiry of Ministry, which said that Guilbeault's office "has not received any correspondence asking for more internet censorship or regulation."

**

Senators last night began proposing amendments to Heritage Minister Steven Guilbeault’s Bill C-10, the first of two cabinet bills to regulate the internet. Legislators proposed lengthy committee hearings that would slow the bill: “Shouldn’t we ask Canadians if they even want the internet regulated in this way?”

 

(Sidebar: Canadians should also be asking Retirement Barbie where the billions of dollars she lost is.) 

 

Yes, but he also didn't sell off the CBC, either, so ... :

One notable difference is that, at least to my knowledge, he never sued his the speaker. He appreciated that the speaker is the very voice of the House of Commons itself, all of it, the opposition parties and the government and the independents. He keeps order, he protects the dignity of the chamber, he guarantees the rights of all — all — MPs. He or she is not to be derogated. Never mind sued by one of the members of the House over which he presides.

Like, the information that China wasn't the source of COVID-19 when it was, that it was transmissible to humans, that masks don't work and then do, that the Trudeau government had materials and even medicines to combat this when it didn't and even the complications of these flu shots? Like that "misinformation"?:

 

It's not like the government can be trusted:

On June 2, the House of Commons once again passed a motion compelling PHAC to supply unredacted documentation on Qiu and Cheng’s case. This time, Trudeau’s Ministers of Public Health Patty Hadju and Foreign Affairs Minister Marc Garneau both blocked the transfer of documents.

**

Cabinet yesterday said it has “nothing to hide” over the firing of Chinese scientists at a federal lab, but defended a Federal Court reference to seal records in the case. The Court reference seeks to overturn four Commons orders that the files be disclosed to House lawyers under a citation for contempt: “What are you so desperate to hide?”