Saturday, January 09, 2021

[CENSORED]

Consider that anything anyone says or does can be construed as offensive (especially in the days of when taking offense is considered appropriate etiquette) and that those who loudly squeal about the right of monopolies to arbitrarily set rules were the first to complain when they felt marginalised and then remark at the speed at which companies, whose mission is ostensibly the unfettered dissemination of information, can't wait to mimic communist states' censorship rules:

'But as reprehensible as the actions of Donald Trump are, the rampant use of the internet to foment violence and hate, and reinforce white supremacy is about more than any one personality. Donald Trump is certainly not the first politician to exploit the architecture of the internet in this way, and he won’t be the last. We need solutions that don’t start after untold damage has been done."

Baker then went on to make a list of what she thought should be done to curb this "problem":

"-Additional precise and specific actions must also be taken ...


(Sidebar: one would ask when Trump ever championed such an obnoxious political stance but why let facts get in the way of a good narrative?)

**

Alphabet Inc’s Google on Friday suspended the Parler social networking service from its app store, citing posts inciting violence and demanding “robust” content moderation from the app favored by many supporters of U.S. President Donald Trump.


I'll just leave these right here:

"Stay in the streets! The system is throwing every diversionary and de-mobilizing tactic at us. We are fighting to end policing and prisons as a system which necessitates fighting white supremacist capitalist heteropatriarchal imperialism. Vet your comrades and stay focused." — BLM Chicago, Twitter, June 16, 2020. 

**

Facebook and YouTube have also deleted the video message Trump sent on Wednesday, seeking to talk down several hundred protesters who broke into the Capitol building and briefly occupied the chambers of the Senate, House of Representatives and congressional offices.

 

That's right - a message telling people to peaceably go home was deleted by the same people who agonised over the decision to censor.

Way to set a narrative, guys! 

**

Once they succeeded in ending democracy and turning Germany into a one-party dictatorship, the Nazis orchestrated a massive propaganda campaign to win the loyalty and cooperation of Germans. The Nazi Propaganda Ministry, directed by Dr. Joseph Goebbels, took control of all forms of communication in Germany: newspapers, magazines, books, public meetings, and rallies, art, music, movies, and radio. Viewpoints in any way threatening to Nazi beliefs or to the regime were censored or eliminated from all media. 

During the spring of 1933, Nazi student organizations, professors, and librarians made up long lists of books they thought should not be read by Germans. Then, on the night of May 10, 1933, Nazis raided libraries and bookstores across Germany. They marched by torchlight in nighttime parades, sang chants, and threw books into huge bonfires. On that night more than 25,000 books were burned. ...

December 5, 1930
Joseph Goebbels disrupts premiere of film
 
In Berlin, Joseph Goebbels, one of Adolf Hitler’s top deputies, and Storm Troopers (SA) disrupt the premiere of "All Quiet on the Western Front," a film based on the novel of the same title by Erich Maria Remarque. Nazi protestors throw smoke bombs and sneezing powder to halt the film. Members of the audience who protest the disruption are beaten. The novel had always been unpopular with the Nazis, who believed that its depiction of the cruelty and absurdity of war was "un-German." Ultimately, the film will be banned. Remarque will emigrate to Switzerland in 1931, and the Nazis, after coming to power, will revoke his German citizenship in 1938. ...

 

Why does this sound familiar?

Dark times ahead.


1 comment:

Cherubino said...

Perhaps Democracy is the problem in that it naturally develops into a dictatorship. Most voters are little tyrants not looking out for the common good but their own private good. It follows that the elected official would be too.