People actually voted for this:
To wit:
A sitting prime minister stopped a criminal investigation into his office before an election and was promptly voted back in.
Canada does not aspire to be a banana republic. It is one.
Oh, but it is. The 2019 election confirmed that:
(Sidebar: but they are able to get healthcare that Canadians who pay for it cannot get.)
Yes, but that won't happen:
Oh, don't waste your time:
Here's why:
Yes, about that:
**
**
Who loved the little sparrow?
Not Mao, apparently.
The Commons ethics committee yesterday by a 6-4 vote rejected further hearings on SNC-Lavalin Group Inc. influence in the Prime Minister’s Office. However Lobbying Commissioner Nancy BĂ©langer confirmed she reviewed complaints the Prime Minister breached federal law with possible recourse to an RCMP probe: “I would not want to jeopardize the integrity of any police investigation.”
To wit:
The RCMP has been looking into potential obstruction of justice in the handling of the prosecution of SNC-Lavalin Group Inc., but its examination has been stymied by the federal government’s refusal to lift cabinet confidentiality for all witnesses ...
A sitting prime minister stopped a criminal investigation into his office before an election and was promptly voted back in.
Canada does not aspire to be a banana republic. It is one.
Oh, but it is. The 2019 election confirmed that:
To a lesser extreme I see that in Hussen. He does not appear to care for those for whom he is supposed to serve. And he and Prime Minister Justin Trudeau have a goal of bringing in one million immigrants. Many are given welfare benefits, and the stats say they remain on the dole. But one has to wonder where is the money going to come from to support them. And of course the answer is, for the most part, Canadians – including their children and grandchildren.
If I saw someone trying to take something away from one of my children or grandchildren there would be hell to pay. How is stealing our children’s legacy and birthright not seen in the same light?
Canada does not need a million more immigrants. Canada doesn’t need those that have been shoved at her since Trudeau was elected. Many aren’t vetted, many have disrespected legal channels, and many go on the dole and apparently stay there.
(Sidebar: but they are able to get healthcare that Canadians who pay for it cannot get.)
Trudeau has complained of “Old Stock Canadians” since he took office and said Canada belongs to immigrants. But the country is not his to give away, nor are the many millions of dollars he’s giving away to other nations.
Canada belongs to the folks whose ancestors settled the land, established cities, built the railroads, universities, and established medical miracles.
Still, if someone wants to follow the law, pay their own way, show respect and become assimilated into Canadian society, they’re more than welcome.
Yes, but that won't happen:
At such an unstable and dangerous moment, Canada could certainly benefit from having a serious person like Harper at the helm.
Once you've rejected an adult with experience for a frat-boy, I'm sure that cuts too deep for a callback.
Oh, don't waste your time:
President Donald Trump is dispatching his point man on Huawei Technologies to Ottawa Monday to press the Trudeau government on barring the Chinese telecom giant from next-generation 5G wireless networks in Canada.
Here's why:
Former Canadian ambassador to China Howard Balloch had high praise for China's late Chairman Mao Zedong, saying that he and his administration achieved "great things."
Yes, about that:
State retribution for tiny thefts, such as stealing a potato, even by a child, would include being tied up and thrown into a pond; parents were forced to bury their children alive or were doused in excrement and urine, others were set alight, or had a nose or ear cut off. One record shows how a man was branded with hot metal. People were forced to work naked in the middle of winter; 80 per cent of all the villagers in one region of a quarter of a million Chinese were banned from the official canteen because they were too old or ill to be effective workers, so were deliberately starved to death.
**
Forty years ago China was in the middle of the world's largest famine: between the spring of 1959 and the end of 1961 some 30 million Chinese starved to death and about the same number of births were lost or postponed. The famine had overwhelmingly ideological causes, rating alongside the two world wars as a prime example of what Richard Rhodes labelled public manmade death, perhaps the most overlooked cause of 20th century mortality.
**
Mao thought that sparrows ate too much grain and it seemed rational to him for all sparrows to be killed.
According to Mao Zedong, sparrows were getting in the way of the economic development of the People’s Republic of China. During the next three years, 45 million people died in a famine caused by economic mismanagement, environmental disaster, and state terror.
Who loved the little sparrow?
Not Mao, apparently.
No comments:
Post a Comment